Disqualified as Prime Minister (PM) by the Supreme Court (SC) on July 28, Nawaz Sharif was forced to relinquish his position as President of the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) â€“ PML-N.
On Monday, October 2, 2017 the Constitution of Pakistan was made a mockery of by â€œElection Act 2017â€, an Amendment in contradiction of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution. Tailor-made for one individual, this Act allowed any person disqualified from holding public office to lead political parties. It is no surprise Nawaz was promptly elected President PML (N) â€œunopposedâ€. Despite parliamentary debates on electoral reforms going on for a number of years, changing the partyâ€™s Constitution now, post-haste to accommodate Nawazâ€™s re-election shows personal motivation. The PML (N) is not a political party but a family fiefdom.
A number of eminent lawyers in Pakistan hold that a legislation passed by the two Houses of Parliament would not constitute contempt of the unanimous verdict/ratio of the judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court (SC) in what is commonly called â€œPanamaGateâ€. The parameters of the three pillars of the Constitution being Legislature, Executive and Judiciary, functioning and powers are laid down in various relevant Articles to act and perform their respective stipulated duties and obligations in their respective domains.Â In particular those of the Executive and the Legislature passing such laws are prima facie not violative of the Fundamental Rights and Human Rights enshrined in the Constitution. Coupled with Articles 4, 5(2), 2(a) 37 and 38 of the Constitution, the superior courts of Pakistan have also laid down the same principle.Â Even then civilized logic demands that any laws enacted must have sincere intent and motive, and that these laws would be for the good of the entire people and not one single individual. Can Parliament pass laws that protect the corrupt from facing accountability? Tailored to â€œdemocraticâ€ whims for a cover up of corruption, money-laundering, perjury, forgery, etc, passing this Nawaz-specific Amendment may or may not be contempt of court. However, it shows utter contempt for the people of Pakistan.
Indicative of a mindset totally devoid of reality, some party faithful hailed this â€œDoomsday politicsâ€ as a â€˜historic day for democracy in Pakistanâ€™. In reality, given the extraordinary evidence collected by the Joint Investigating Team (JIT), Nawaz, his siblings and son-in-law will go to jail. One does not believe the superior judiciary will succumb to the across the board subjective abuse, threats and blackmail of the worst kind. Maryam can keep on â€œtwitteringâ€ as much as she wants. Faking the news (and then leaking it through the social media) is not going to work. While this controversial amendment is Nawaz-specific, known extremists and criminals such as Uzair Baloch, Gullu Butt and others condemned by a court of law can now head political parties, with potentially disastrous consequences for the nation.Â Given the examples of nations such as Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, this amendment can potentially foment civil strife as is happening in many Islamic countries, resulting in anarchy. That will only lead, despite all the misgivings of the men in uniform, to an unnecessary â€œmeasure of last resortâ€. What good will we all do holding the Constitution aloft while the country goes up in flames?
Boasting democratic credentials and espousing commitment to the democratic ideals notwithstanding, the passage of the PML (N)-sponsored law negates every democratic principle. A weak Opposition could only â€œengage in cosmetic protestâ€ (according to PPPâ€™s Khursheed Shah) against the Bills. The pathetic figurehead of a President almost fell over himself rubber-stamping the legislation with remarkable alacrity.
With his review petition rejected unanimously by the SC, Nawaz Sharif and his party men went on a warpath, crossing all Constitutional bounds publicly heaping verbal abuse upon the judges and members of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), mixing facts with fiction, not only defying but defiling their good name and stature and threatening themselves with dire consequences. We have seen the Sharif men attacking the SC physically in 1998. This behaviour confirms that rule of law has no meaning for them. A belligerent Nawaz failed to mobilize the people into the streets. Nawazâ€™s anguished cry of â€œMujhe que nikala? (why was I ousted?), conveniently forgets his own active role in removing PM Benazir Bhutto on two separate occasions and then getting PM Yousuf Raza Gilani disqualified in 2012. Instead of legally rebutting the charges of money-laundering, tax evasion, perjury, forgery, and similar charges, trying to divert public opinion by going off on a totally political tangent will not work.
The PML (N) has been hinting at conspiracy theories, the exact nature of which remain unclear. Despite their innuendos and best efforts, the PML (N) could not trace any military fingerprints in Nawazâ€™s ouster as PM in the PanamaGate affair. Fortunate to have survived the 2013 election rigging case and the â€œDawn Leaksâ€ scandal, the former PM remains intent on baiting the Army. His deep-rooted dislike of the military represents an inherent inferiority complex. This psychological mental roadblock has probably manifested because he entered politics on the Armyâ€™s sponsorship. Compared to Zardari who owes his political standing to the â€œmurder by proxyâ€ of Ms. Benazir, Nawaz comes across as a decent human being.Â Maryamâ€™s ambitions a la Benazir are hell-bent on making him act way out of character as an ogre for his daughterâ€™s sake.
Coupled with Maryam-type provocations, the Amendment is a giant step for â€œdoomsday politicsâ€ and could well lead to a D-Day. The despicable speech Safdar made in the National Assembly (NA) against the Ahmadis confirms Nawaz fully deserves his son-in-law. Keeping his cool Gen Qamar Bajwa has kept his rank and file, rendering tremendous sacrifices in the war on terror on a daily basis in the backdrop of unsuccessful efforts to erode the discipline of the military hierarchy. Two very significant three-star postings serve as a clear and unambiguous warning to Sharifâ€™s loyalists. Should our soldiers keep dying to protect the corrupt? The DG ISPR dismissed any possibility of a martial law, — â€œfriction between army and civilian authorities, should not even be talked aboutâ€. Despite the Armyâ€™s â€œsilenceâ€ the PML (N) tried to provoke something out of nothing.
A petition challenging the PML (N) â€œvictoryâ€ Election Act 2017 as unlawful, unconstitutional and of no legal effect has been filed in the SC, praying the annulling of Nawazâ€™s re-election. To its credit the Senate has passed a resolution against a disqualified person heading a political party. We want to see a nation free from the clutches of the corrupt and greedy. If the Honorable SC judges stand their ground in spite of being subjected to â€œKautilya’s Arthashastra-typeâ€ attacks, they will truly provide the light at the end of the tunnel the people of Pakistan so fervently aspire for.
The writer is a defence and security analyst.