No funds for Make in India: Army vice chief

No funds for Make in India: Army vice chief

SAM Report,
SHARE

Insufficient modernisation funds provided by the Central government have “dashed the Army’s hopes” as they would not be able to cater to their ongoing procurement projects, the Army Vice Chief has told a parliamentary panel.

The issue of lack of funds for the services has come up at a time when the state-run companies like Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) have had to take loans to pay salaries to their employees. The report did not name the Army Vice Chief.

The Vice Army chief claimed: “Marginal increase in capital in the budget allocation for the Army has dashed all hopes. The fund allocation is barely enough to counter the inflation level, and did not even cater to the affect of the increased tax burden.”

“The fund allocation for the modernisation in 2018-19 was insufficient to cater to committed liabilities, on-going schemes, ‘Make in India’ projects, infrastructural development, policy of strategic partnership of foreign and Indian companies and procurement of arms and ammunition,” says the Standing Committee on Defence headed by BJP MP and former Cabinet Minister Kalraj Mishra in its report.

The Ministry of Defence, however, said: “It does not agree with the contention of the Vice Chief of Army Staff (VCoAS), contending that there were years when the force had not been able to fully utilise their budget.”

The Committee said that for modernisation, the three services had asked for a projected requirement of Rs 1,32,212.34 crore but only Rs 86,488.01 crore was allocated last year.

“Under the same head, the projection was for Rs 1,72,203.3 crore but the allocation is just Rs 93,982.13 crore. Of this, committed liabilities would be to the tune of Rs 1,10,043.78 crore. Thus, the budgetary allocation is much less vis-a-vis the committed liabilities,” the panel said.

Committed liabilities are the amount of payments to be made by the defence forces for the acquisitions made by them during the previous financial years for contracts which have already been signed.

The Committee has further said in the report that the representatives of the Navy too detailed the implications of lower allocations of capital budget which would constrain the progress of new schemes and the ability to conclude contracts.

The Committee said the likely delay in induction of critical capabilities, and attendant cost overruns, impact on the progress of infrastructure projects, and mitigation of shortage of accommodation as well would be a general setback to the pace of modernisation of the Indian Navy.

print