After a gap of ten years, senior officials from India, Japan, Australia and United States met in Manila and agreed that a â€œfreeâ€ and â€œopenâ€ Indo-Pacific was in their common interest.
The meeting happened less than a month after the Japanese foreign minister Taro Kano revealed the consultations had already begun for a â€œtop-levelâ€ dialogue between the four countries.
The last meeting of officials of the four countries took place in May 2007 in the Filipino capital on the sidelines of the ASEAN Regional Forum. That same year, all four countries, as well as Singapore, took part in the Malabar exercises in September. However, the initiative failed to take off after Australia withdrew under pressure from China.
It took a decade for the countries to get back together â€“ again in Manila.
The 2007 meeting was declared as â€œexploratoryâ€, with officials from additional secretary rank.
This time, the officials were a tad junior at joint secretary-level. The Indian officials at the table were joint secretaries in charge of MEAâ€™s desks of East Asia and Southeast Asia, Pranay Verma and Vinay Kumar.
The MEA press release noted that the meeting was for â€œfor consultations on issues of common interest in the Indo-Pacific regionâ€.
â€œThe discussions focused on cooperation based on their converging vision and values for promotion of peace, stability and prosperity in an increasingly inter-connected region that they share with each other and with other partners,â€ it added.
The Japan foreign ministryâ€™s press note said that the officials â€œdiscussed measures to ensure a free and open international order based on the rule of law in the Indo-Pacificâ€.
The Australians stated that the four countries met to â€œdiscuss a shared vision for increased prosperity and security in the Indo-Pacific region and to work together to ensure it remains free and openâ€.
There were similar buzz words in the three press notes from the Indian, Japanese and Australian foreign ministries. The US state department had still not issued its version.
All of them spoke about a free, open â€œIndo-Pacificâ€ region and that discussions covered terrorism, proliferation, connectivity.
But, there was also differing omissions among the various read-outs.
The Japanese and Australians noted that the discussions around proliferation were around the North Korea, which was not specifically mentioned by India publicly.
Ahead of the meeting, India has been treading with care to project the meeting of the four countries is not an anti-China clique.
When asked initially last month about the proposal for a quadrilateral, Indian foreign ministry spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said that India was â€œopen to working with India is open to working with like-minded countries on issues that advance our interests and promote our viewpoint.â€ He cited Indiaâ€™s trilateral discussions with China and Russia on the Asia-Pacific as one such example.
Last time in 2007, China had issued a demarche to all the countries over the meeting of the meeting over the quadrilateral meeting. Chinese president Hu Jintao had even personally asked
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi will be meeting with all three of his counterparts from US, Japan and Australia at the East Asia summit. He is also scheduled to meet with Chinese premier Li Keqiang, which will be their first meeting since the Doklam stand-off came to an end. Modi had earlier met President Xi at the BRICS summit in Xiamen.